Until recently i thought the load average (as shown for example in top) was a moving average on the n last values of the number of process in state "runnable" or "running". And n would have been defined by the "length" of the moving average: since the algorithm to compute load average seems to trigger every 5 sec, n would have been 12 for the 1min load average, 12x5 for the 5 min load average and 12x15 for the 15 min load average.
But then i read this article: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9001. The article is quite old but the same algorithm is implemented today in the linux kernel. The load average is not a moving average but .. an algorithm for which i don't know a name. Anyway i made a comparison between the linux kernel algorithm and a moving average for an imaginary periodic load:
There is a huge difference.
Finally my questions are:
- Why this implementation have been choosen compared to a true moving average, that has a real meaning to anyone ?
- Why everybody speaks about "1min load average" since much more than the last minute is taken into account by the algorithm. (mathematically, all the measure since the boot; in practice, taking into accound the round-off error.. still a lot of measures)
Thank you for your time