Is it due to the buffering in memory? I did
cp /network/large_file . & and I kept doing
ls -lh to monitor progress, but the file didn't appear until it was about 400MB. Linux 2.6 kernel, Bash 4, 4GB swap, 16GB RAM.
This is likely to be dependent on your underlying filesystem, possible hdd buffers, raid controller buffers (if you are using raid), etc. When a file is copied, it first starts the stream in memory, notifying the disk there is a pending write operation - and the disk takes care of it from there. It's very common for a write to have "completed", but the file is actually still being written by the disk. Some filesystems prevent this "lag" such as ZFS and I believe BtrFS (this is known as copy-on-write). Other filesystems will report the copy/write operation is completed when it's not really -- which can lead to file corruption if power is lost, etc. ZFS and BtrFS don't report back to the OS that a file write operation is completed until it is fully complete -- preventing this situation.
To test this, try doing a copy of something largerish - such as a DVD iso of your favorite distro from one directory to another. The command line will return to the prompt in a short while, but if you immediately type