Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been reading papers on Plan 9 from Bell Labs. In the paper on why Plan 9's not dead yet, around page 18, the author mentions "Farber". Googling reveals this to be a James Farber, but all I can find is that he coauthored UNIX: The Complete Reference. Who was he, and why is he important to UNIX?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The only things additional I found:

I also found this reference to a conversation between Dave Korn and Jim Farber which I found funny. It was in the comp.unix.user-friendly group over on Google Groups from 1994.


Now for my psychologist hat. Editing skills are highly overlearned, so switching editors in unavoidably anti-productive because of negative transfer. It does not matter which editor you switch to or from. The best editor is always the one you have used the most, or a proper superset of it. That, by the way, was the advice Dave Korn got from Jim Farber and myself back when he was first designing ksh. And I think the world is better for it. Regards,

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.