Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What would be the best distro for running off a USB, tried with ubuntu but it was too slow because of I/O. Would it be possible to run it from memory so it it's faster or would that make initial loading a lot slower? What i need is something that i can run off a USB that boots and shuts down fast preferably with the same packages as ubuntu. I'd also like to know how to make it so it doesnt ask me to install it every time, bascially install it on a usb, size is not much of an issue.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by mattdm Apr 5 '13 at 18:43

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Are you sure you weren't running an Ubuntu live image? It shouldn't be so slow. –  Tshepang Feb 20 '11 at 19:23
    
Yes i was using a live cd with persistence options chosen from the usb installer, how would i install it? –  user4924 Feb 21 '11 at 8:05
    
This question mostly got a bunch of "try this it works" suggestions; by demonstration, not a good fit for the site. –  mattdm Apr 5 '13 at 18:43

6 Answers 6

switching distros will not help you much, since your problem is i/o performance like you assumed. different distro will only help if you go with a very small one, which in turn will most likely not have the packagebase of ubuntu availible.

you might have some success with building a custom ubuntu-based live-cd, but then again, you would have to leave out the big packages like gnome etc, so there would not be really a point in using ubuntu in the first place.

share|improve this answer

Tinycorelinux boots incredibly fast. It may not have all of ubuntu's features out of the box. But it has a large set of extensions.

By default tinycorelinux boots entirely into RAM so everything is lightening fast. Even the home folder resides in RAM.

If you are going to experiment with tincorelinux I reccemond installing qemu in ubuntu. Then just call the tinycore-current.iso file from the command line. Qemu is slow but has worked well with tinycorelinux for me.

qemu -cdrom tinycore-current.iso
share|improve this answer
    
An alternative to Qemu is VirtualBox. Some have found it easier to start with. –  phunehehe Feb 21 '11 at 2:48
3  
Honestly I felt qemu is easier if you are just booting a live cd. 'qemu -cdrom tinycore-current.iso' and the cd boots. Otherwise you must select like 10 menus and selections in VirtualBox. Not to mention VirtualBox is not compatible with some live CDs. –  Liam William Feb 21 '11 at 3:54
    
qemu is quite fast if your processor supports VT-x or AMD-V –  chris Feb 21 '11 at 9:48

Knoppix is a popular choice. I use Gentoo liveDVD, converted to USB stick.

share|improve this answer
    
I used a Russian version of Knoppix (that I bought pre-installed, from an ordinary computer store in Moscow) a long time ago. My impression of Knoppix then was that it had a comical or silly touch, with big, round icons and such. When I switched to Debian, I felt it was much more mature. But that might be totally subjective because back then I wasn't that systematic in my computer life. Just thought I'd tell you. –  Emanuel Berg Apr 5 '13 at 2:24

I tried Ubuntu 12.04 but I was not a fan of the OS and having to install a lot of software to compensate for the Windows 7 tradeoff. I'm still learning though but I have created a Linux Mint 14 MATE Live USB with Persistence created using LiLi and have to say that I am very pleased with the overall performance on my nettop. I have yet to try it on my laptop but I would say the speed in boot up and shutdown are not too bad considering that it works via usb (2-3min boot and up to 1min on shutdown). It has a nice clean OS, an office suite program package, codecs to enjoy my media, and Firefox. You could also try Puppy Linux or try creating your own custom Ubuntu Disc using Ubuntu Mini Remix and UCK, Remastersys, Ubuntu builder, etc. I did not like Puppy Linux because it looked dated (sorry it sounds a little shallow but even Windows XP's default theme looked better to me). In any case, I hope you find the solution that works best for you.

share|improve this answer
    
First, Ubuntu has a lot of stuff (too much perhaps). Second, with the package manager that comes with it it is child's play to install whatever you'd like. I don't get the "Windows 7 tradeoff" part. –  Emanuel Berg Apr 5 '13 at 2:20

i recommend you Linux Mint 13, with XFCE4. I have and old laptop where I use this distro and I am satisfied with it.

Linux Mint is modern and popular, ubuntu compatible, so it would not be hard to get information, because there are a lot of ubuntu forums. if your computer is old, you can use a lightweight window manager, like openbox or fluxbox.

Drawback:

linux mint does not boot fast because of the kernel, but there are some twicks that can be done for that (changing the kernel, maybe?)

share|improve this answer

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

If you have a modern computer which can handle desktop effects i recommend linux mint 14 (nadia) or Mageia, both are high rank distro's. But the choice is yours to prefer which desktop

Mageia

enter image description here

Mint

enter image description here

These distro's are complex and beautiful but takes a little more time to boot

share|improve this answer