Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Take, for example, this command:

find . -regex ".*\.\(cpp\|h\)"

This will find all the .h and .cpp files in your directory. The period character '.' in regular expressions usually means "any character". To get it to match only an actual period, you must escape it using the backslash character '\'.

In this case, given a character with a special meaning, you must escape it to get the actual character it represents.

Now, take the parenthesis and the "or" bar, being characters '(', ')', and '|', respectively. These also have special meanings, used for grouping regular expressions. However, to get the special meaning, the characters must be escaped using the backslash! Without the backslash, the characters have the meaning of the actual character it represents.

Why is the '.' treated differently from '(', ')', and '|'?

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

The answer is really "just because". There's a whole bunch of different regular expression syntaxes, and while they share a similar appearance and usually the basics are the same, they vary in the particulars.

Historically, every tool had its own new implementation, doing whatever the author thought best. There's a balance between making characters special with and without escaping — too many characters that are "naturally special" and you end up having to escape them all the time just to match on them; or, the other way around, you send up having a bunch of escapes to use common regex syntax like () grouping. And everyone writing a program decided how to do it based on the needs of what their program matched against, on what they felt was the right approach, and on the phase of the moon.

There's an attempt at standardization from POSIX, which defines "basic regular expressions" and "extended regular expressions". Awesomely, these work backwards from each other in regards to \sometimes, but not with perfect consistency.

Perl regular expressions have become another defacto standard, for two reasons: first, they're very flexible and powerful, and second, they're actually pretty sane, with conventions like "\ always escapes a non-alphanumeric character".

GNU Find has a -regextype option, where you can change the regular expression syntax used. Sadly, "perl" is not an option, at least in the version of find I have. (The default is, not surprisingly from GNU, "emacs", and that syntax is documented here.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.