Sign up ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was playing around with date to try to convert expressions such as "2 hours" to a number of seconds like 7200. I thought I could perform this with invocations such as:

date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 + 2 hours" +"%s"

Yet, I noticed extremely strange results while so doing. (My /etc/timezone contains "Europe/Paris", hence the use of TZ to force UTC times.)

omega:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00" +"%s"             
omega:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 + 0 minutes" +"%s"
omega:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 + -1 minutes" +"%s" 
omega:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 + 1 minutes" +"%s" 

The first result is reasonable enough, but I'm really totally puzzled about how date might have come up with the three last results. Does anyone understand the logic between those results?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 11 down vote accepted

I think it's taking your + x as a time-zone specifier (e.g., consider 2013-04-25 19:52:36 +4 is a valid timestamp, in in a time zone 4 hours ahead of UTC).

It's then seeing the word 'minutes', and treating it as a synonym of minute, so giving you one minute later.

If you put in an explicit timezone specifier, it works:

anthony@Zia:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC" +"%s"   
anthony@Zia:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC + 0 minutes" +"%s"
anthony@Zia:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC + -1 minutes" +"%s" 
anthony@Zia:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC + 1 minutes" +"%s" 

Note the UTC after the seconds field. You can also put in a second +0:

anthony@Zia:~$ TZ=utc date -d "1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0 + -1 minutes" +"%s"

... but at least personally, that's much harder to read.

Or you can put a Z after the seconds, etc. You don't actually need the TZ environment variable to be set to UTC in the above examples.

share|improve this answer
I agree with your interpretation. You can also write it date -d '1970-1-1 0:0:0 1 minute' and date -d '1970-1-1 0:0:0 1 minute ago' –  Stéphane Chazelas Apr 25 '13 at 18:01
Thanks for finding this out! Do you know any shorter way to obtain the number of seconds of a duration like "2 days" with date? (e.g., an abbreviation for the epoch) –  a3nm Apr 28 '13 at 12:33
@a3nm Suggest you ask a question on that. Durations are either trivial (1 day=86,400 seconds) or complicated (how long is one month? Was there a leap second?) –  derobert Apr 28 '13 at 20:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.