Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

An old HP desktop just came my way for service. Was running XP, but the install is trashed. User would like to switch to Linux, but the box it's only a 950mhz Celeron with 384MB RAM. It does have a decent sized hard drive though (40GB), so something should fit. I tried OpenSuSE 11.3, but it just goes to a black screen part way through the installer. What's the fullest featured distro I can squeeze onto this box?

share|improve this question
1  
possible dupe: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/5733/… –  Tshepang Jan 18 '11 at 15:35

7 Answers 7

The Debian installer is text-based and is included in the *Ubuntu distriubtion as the "Alternate" CD. There are many lightweight distributions available, such as Puppy Linux, Damn Small Linux and Tiny Core.

More mainstream distributions such as Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint and Fedora have lightweight "spins" available, which include either XFCE, LXDE or Fluxbox. Coincidentally I was testing out Lubuntu today (an "unofficial" Ubuntu variant which uses LXDE) and Linux Mint Fluxbox.

It is also worth remembering that the applications which are installed with the distribution or which you install should also be lightweight if possible. It would be counter-productive to install a lightweight distribution on your hardware and then expect it to run Firefox with two dozen tabs open as well as OpenOffice.

share|improve this answer

I'd have a look at Archlinux for 686, you could install enlightenment 16 or 17, fluxbox or LXDE as a lightweight windows manager and it should run OK on that configuration.

If you can squeeze some more RAM in it it will help greatly, 1Go would be great IMHO.

share|improve this answer
    
If I had another stick of 256MB PC133 (but I don't) I could get it up to 512MB, but that's about as far as this thing will go. –  Brian Knoblauch Jan 18 '11 at 17:47

I'd try Slackware. I've put Slackware 13.1 on a very used laptop and had it work pretty well, but I've also backed off to Slackware 11.0 on a circa 2002 Compaq "EVO". The "EVO" has that ugly, ill-supported "Brookdale" graphics chipset, and the latest and greatest X11 doesn't do Brookdale hardly at all.

share|improve this answer

Your question reminded me of a distro chooser mentioned in chat a few weeks back. Seems accurate enough, based on a small and completely unscientific trial I ran with friends.

Anyways, according to that widget, you might want to take another crack at OpenSuSE. Of course, I had to guess on some of the questions; your results may differ.

share|improve this answer
    
Same results apparently. It said OpenSuSE or Fedora... –  Brian Knoblauch Jan 18 '11 at 17:46

you can also try Ubuntu LTS 10.04 for this box :)

I have heard about the Fedora 14 LXDE/xfce Spins they are good for low power cpu's

share|improve this answer

I would say that something with XFCE will probably be your best bet. I had great success with a custom Debian install running XFCE instead of Gnome on a Pentium3 500MHz with 512MB ram; nowadays I would probably use Arch though.

share|improve this answer
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Well, unfortunately, I ended up giving up. I did some testing under VirtualBox on my machine and had no problem installing and working with several distros with 256-384MB of RAM, yet I was unable to get any to install on that Celeron. It's heading out for recycling. The newer Linux kernels really don't seem to be tolerant of older hardware. I had to recycle a couple of my own boxes recently as they just wouldn't take newer Linux versions (despite older ones working fine, and having plenty of hardware). I guess the kernel team must have had to start dumping support for older hardware in order to move forward. :-(

share|improve this answer
    
Just a further comment. I grabbed a Pentium 4 machine (that runs Solaris just fine, so I KNOW it's pretty standard hardware!) with 1 GiB RAM and am getting the exact same results. Are Celeron and Pentium 4 no longer supported by the current Linux kernel? –  Brian Knoblauch Jan 28 '11 at 14:14
    
Interesting. Have you tried just loading an older distro? Or is that not an option in this case? –  Pops Feb 7 '11 at 20:41
    
I'm able to load older distros on other boxes with the same symptoms. Ended up just scrapping this box as the older distro was unacceptable. Oh well, we tried to keep it going but at some point there's just no helping it anymore I guess. –  Brian Knoblauch Feb 7 '11 at 20:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.