Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Steps to reproduce:

germar@host:~$ cd /tmp/
germar@host:/tmp$ touch test && chmod u+s test && ls -la test
-rwSr--r-- 1 germar germar 0 Nov  2 20:11 test
germar@host:/tmp$ chown germar:germar test && ls -la test
-rw-r--r-- 1 germar germar 0 Nov  2 20:11 test

Tested with Debian squeeze and Ubuntu 12.04

share|improve this question
    
Does that on Fedora 17 too. –  BenjiWiebe Nov 2 '12 at 19:45
    
feature –  mikeserv Aug 5 at 2:05

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Not a bug according to chown documentation:

$ info coreutils 'chown invocation'

   The `chown' command sometimes clears the set-user-ID or set-group-ID
permission bits.  This behavior depends on the policy and functionality
of the underlying `chown' system call, which may make system-dependent
file mode modifications outside the control of the `chown' command.
For example, the `chown' command might not affect those bits when
invoked by a user with appropriate privileges, or when the bits signify
some function other than executable permission (e.g., mandatory
locking).  When in doubt, check the underlying system behavior.
share|improve this answer
    
Thanks jlliagre. I didn't know info coreutils before. I only read man-page and searched the web. –  Germar Nov 2 '12 at 20:59

This is by design, and it's standard behavior. Quoting the POSIX standard:

Unless chown is invoked by a process with appropriate privileges, the set-user-ID and set-group-ID bits of a regular file shall be cleared upon successful completion; the set-user-ID and set-group-ID bits of other file types may be cleared.

(s is setuid (or setgid in the group column), not sticky, by the way.)

This behavior follows that of the underlying system call (except that on some systems, the setxid bits are only cleared for executable files).

The reason for removing the setuid bit is that changing the owner also changes which user will be the process's effective user ID. In particular, on systems where a user can give away a file, cp /bin/sh foo; chmod u+s foo; chown joe foo would create a setuid executable belonging to joe, a giant security hole.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.