Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Currently I am using Dirvish to backup a handful remote machines, both Linux and Windows to local disks. But Dirvish hasn't seen any updates for many years and it has a couple of small annoyances (e.g. deleting the last successful backup when it expires by age).

Dirvish features I currently use include (and thus require):

  • pre-client - to dump databases to flat files on remote system
  • post-server - for basic analysis of changed files in backup set
  • connect to remote clients using rsync over ssh

Are there any alternatives for Dirvish available that are actively being maintained? Now I did a Google search myself and I did find one alternative, but I am looking for your experience; does the package work for you and why?

share|improve this question
    
I'm guessing you'll have to do scripting to get the extra features with most software available. I've been liking pdumpfs and rdiff-backup for disk-based backups over time. –  XTL Oct 29 '12 at 7:05
    
Have a look at rsnapshot; it has worked well for me but I haven't checked the maintainance situation recently. I believe it meets your three requirements. Here's some more: unix.stackexchange.com/a/52868/4801 –  dubiousjim Oct 29 '12 at 15:05
    
This post describes a patch for dirvish where the most recent successful image is no longer being expired: mail-archive.com/dirvish@dirvish.org/msg01457.html –  jippie Aug 2 '13 at 21:52

2 Answers 2

I reviewed a number of backup solutions and just scraped them. Currently I use only ZFS for backups and that's why:

  1. There are good configurable scripts for managing snapshots the way I like.
  2. Transparent compression whenever I go with ability to look into each snapshot like just any other file system.
  3. Ability to create difference steams in case rsync is too cumbersome (yeah, I have some folders >10G and more than 100'000 files -- rsync makes hard drives burn syncing them).
  4. Latest versions can ditch writing data to files if blocks wasn't changed. Just imagine rewriting a 1G file adding only 100M to target fs.

The only thing I was missing was replicating remote filesystem differentially and I just wrote a script for that.

share|improve this answer

Consider using r1soft we have been using it for the past 2 years and it suits our requirement, especially the bare metal restore.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.