Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here is my dilemma. Suddenly, as of yesterday, multicast packets are no longer being received from eth1 (private gigabit network) from one node. Routing between all the nodes is fine, no collisions, packet loss, etc.

ifconfig info, inet addr, Bcast, Mask, are all fine - they all share the same bcast and netmask. Also, they all share: UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 on eth1 .

These nodes are all hosted by a Xen VM provider. All the guests are seeing each others private IP addresses. There are no iptables rules involved. Multicast packets can be seen between all the nodes (20+) except one - using tcpdump. The system was restarted, etc.

just to add, the affected node, according to netstat -g is not being assigned the multicast group, "eth1 1 224.2.2.4" as all the others.

What would cause something like this? It seems that one node is no longer part of the multicast group - I have a ticket opened but I have a feeling they are stumped.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

I'm not aware of any expiration policy for IGMP group membership within the Linux stack. It may happen, but I doubt it, since there are at least two ways for the kernel to be told (one explicit, the other implicit) when a program's IGMP membership should be dropped.

Therefore, I think you have a bug in the software listening for the multicast packets. (Care to name it?) The program receiving the multicast has somehow either dropped its own membership or neglected to add its membership on starting up. On restarting the multicast listener program, tcpdump should see the IGMPv2+ group add membership request go out on the network.

You may well have never noticed this bug when testing on a small LAN since cheap network switches don't understand IGMP. The feature is called IGMP snooping, and it's only found in switches roughly 5× the cost, per port, of the cheapest units, or more. A switch without IGMP snooping ability — or one with the feature turned off — turns multicast into broadcast, so IGMP group-add messages aren't necessary.

Your hosting provider apparently has IGMP snooping enabled on their network fabric, since multicast messages stopped coming in after the IGMP group membership went away on the troubled machine's network stack.

It may also be that the hosting provider's IGMP snooping options are misconfigured in the switches, so they're dropping the group membership, but that doesn't explain the netstat -g result.

share|improve this answer
    
you're correct regarding netstat -g . We are using hazelcast for this. I just realized that nodes without hazelcast, that don't even need to be listening to those multicasts, according to tcpdump are still getting it - even when not part of the group - which is fine. But it doesn't explain why one node doesn't seem to be receiving them properly. –  Tom G4 Jul 7 '12 at 15:38
    
The continuing reception of mcast packets means one of two things: 1. You once ran hazelcast on that node, the switch saw the IGMP group join, didn't see a group drop, and so is still sending packets...some switches have a "fast leave" feature to fix this, but it can cause more problems than it solves; or 2. the hosting provider hasn't enabled IGMP snooping, in which case you have some problem with the node itself. Try the tcpdump test, looking for the IGMP group add request. –  Warren Young Jul 7 '12 at 15:48
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.