Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm setting up a few ubuntu boxes, and using opscode's chef as a configuration tool. It would be fairly easy to install public keys for each user on each of these servers, and disable password authentication.

However, the users should also have sudo privileges though, which by default requires a password.

If I want to use the users' public keys as a method of access management and allow the users sudo privileges, does that mean I should also set up the users with NOPASSWD: ALL in visduo, or is there a way that a user can change their own password if they only have public key authentication?

share|improve this question
3  
    
@sr - doesn't look like this is a mainstream way of doing it... –  cwd Apr 30 '12 at 22:26
    
Why do you want your users to have sudo priveleges? I hope you are aware that you give away a root access by this. There might be a chance here to invest some time and allow only a subset of commands to be used in connection with sudo (which would be maybe less insecure). Go man sudoers will yield info about having certain commands being able to run with sudo without user password necessary at all. You can even add a shellscript to /etc/sudoers which would allow a per user "self-password" setting without the need of a prior password. –  humanityANDpeace Jan 8 '13 at 12:17
    
@humanityANDpeace - I realize this. Our team members all require root access to the cloud servers we maintain. We are now using chef to manage users' public keys and we have a sysadmin group with NOPASSWD: ALL that the team members are part of. If you can suggest a better solution please post it as an answer. –  cwd Jan 9 '13 at 0:24

5 Answers 5

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Sudo, in its most common configuration, requires the user to type his password. Typically, the user already used his password to authenticate into the account, and typing the password again is a way to confirm that the legitimate user hasn't abandoned his console and been hijacked.

In your setup, the user's password would be used only for authentication to sudo. In particular, if a user's SSH key is compromised, the attacker would not be able to elevate to root privileges on the server. The attacker could plant a key loggen into the account, but this key logger would be detectable by other users, and could even be watched for automatically.

A user normally needs to know his current password to change it to a different password. The passwd program verifies this (it can be configured not to, but this is not useful or at all desirable in your scenario). However, root can change any user's password without knowing the old one; hence a user with sudo powers can change his own password without entering it at the passwd prompt by running sudo passwd. If sudo is configured to require the user's password, then the user must have typed the password to sudo anyway.

You can disable password authentication selectively. In your situation, you would disable password authentication in ssh, and possibly in other services. Most services on most modern unices (including Ubuntu) use PAM to configure authentication methods. On Ubuntu, the PAM configuration files live in /etc/pam.d. To disable password authentication, comment out the auth … pam_unix.so line in /etc/pam.d/common-auth. Furthermore, make sure you have PasswordAuthentication no in /etc/ssh/sshd_config to disable sshd's built-in password authentication.

You may want to allow some administrative users to log in with a password, or to allow password authentication on the console. This is possible with PAM (it's pretty flexible), but I couldn't tell you how off the top of my head; ask a separate question if you need help.

share|improve this answer
    
2nd para 3rd line "loggen" => "logger"? –  Kev 41 mins ago

You can use the pam_ssh_agent_auth module. It's pretty simple to compile, and then just add the entry

auth       sufficient pam_ssh_agent_auth.so file=~/.ssh/authorized_keys

before the other auth (or include) entries in /etc/pam.d/sudo

and

Defaults    env_keep += "SSH_AUTH_SOCK"

to /etc/sudoers (via visudo).

Now every user can either authenticate to sudo via a (forwarded or local) SSH agent or their password. It may be wise to ask your users to use ssh-add -c such that each sudo call will at least require some confirmation.

share|improve this answer
    
On a related matter, there's pam_ssh, which allows to use your SSH passphrase instead of the unix one for login, automatically starting an agent and adding the key - thus providing you with a single sign-on possibility. –  Tobias Kienzler Jan 8 '13 at 9:43

Yes, it's incredibly insecure and also allows a user to access the other users passwords, but since they have sudo, not much you can do.

Basically, you do the following:

$ sudo -i

Now, we are root. We have access to everything.

# passwd $username

$username can be anyone's username.

Enter new UNIX password:

Retype new UNIX password: passwd: password updated successfully

Boom, password changed. Again, incredibly insecure because you can change anyones, but it works, but it works. I don't recommend it, but rather offer this answer up as an example of what not to do.

share|improve this answer
    
looks good but can you elaborate on what's going on here? –  cwd Apr 30 '12 at 22:27
2  
It's not possible to do sudo -i without current user password. –  Miro May 1 '12 at 19:51
    
@Miro. It is as you say. Still a sudo bash could be passwordless given that setup so in the /etc/sudoers file. I think @jrg is as said more focusing on the insecurity issue with sudo here –  humanityANDpeace Jan 8 '13 at 12:19
    
honestly, you don't have to do sudo -i, you can jump straight to sudo passwd $username @Miro, you don't need to know the current user password. You only need to know the root password to use sudo –  Antony Jan 6 at 3:40

The point of the password is to ensure that hackers who obtain a user's key, or find an unattended terminal can't gain root access. For this reason I wouldn't recommend any solution that involves passwordless sudo.

I suggest you keep it simple: perhaps email a user the default password with strict instructions to change it ASAP, or else insert a script in their .profile or .login or something such that it demands a new password on their first login. It could disable itself when completed, and you could use expect to enter the existing password so they never have to know it.

share|improve this answer
#% useradd -g somegroup someuser
#% usermod -p "" someuser
#% chage -d 0 someuser
#% sed -i "s/^.*PasswordAuthentication .*/PasswordAuthentication no/" /etc/sshd/sshd_config
#% /sbin/service sshd restart
#% cp -r ~/.ssh `echo ~someuser`
#% chown -R someuser `echo ~someuser`/.ssh
#% chgrp -R somegroup `echo ~someuser`/.ssh
#% echo "%somegroup  ALL=(ALL)   ALL" >> /etc/sudoers

> This should allow you to have users who can login only using public keys and can not use passwords for login. However he will be forced to change the password the first time he logs in...but without having to tell him somedummy password up front...The users will be simply asked to reset the password and subsequently they can use it only for sudo but will not be able to login(ssh) using that password. Note that the trick here is to not to have told users some dummy password which they would then be required to input at the time of login once they are required to to change their password ...In nut shell no communication from admin(root) to the actual user is required.

Hope that helps

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.