Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have heard that Linux, in general, has poor notebook battery management: the battery lifetime is reduced significantly (I have noticed it on my MacBook 2.1 with Ferdora installed)

Are there any differences in power management between the distributions?

share|improve this question

It is not recommended to run Linux an Apple Mac hardware because it is full of firmware obscurity and violations of specifications (like e.g. ACPI, EFI).

If your hardware is well supported under Linux (because the needed specifications are open/published enough and the vendor actually cares) then you get great battery/power management under every current major distribution.

For example, I observed optimal battery management with various Thinkpads, under various distributions. On other Intel based systems I observed better power-management (e.g. fan management) under Linux than under the pre-installed Windows Vista.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer. I have currently Ideapad, do you know if it is supported as good as the mentioned Thinkpad? – Jakub M. Apr 1 '12 at 20:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.