Is ubuntu's /etc/init.d directory exactly equivalent (functionally) to what I presume to be the more standard /etc/rc.d/ (at least on arch)? Is there any particular reason canonical used init.d instead of rc.d for startup scripts?
|
|
|||
|
Ubuntu uses Ubuntu is in the process of switching from SysVinit to Upstart, which uses configuration files in |
|||||||||
|
|
/etc/init.d was the old historical location for SVR4. I forgot why redhat added the /etc/rc.d/ level. I think to isolate things onto rc.d, but then needed to add a bunch of symlinks anyway for backwards compatibility. So there is /etc/init.d in redhat, just it symlinks elsewhere. So the standard location is /etc/init.d, though it may be a symlink not a real directory. There were some really old Linux distros that copied BSD with /etc/rc.local but pretty much no one uses that anymore. |
|||
|
|
/etc/rc.dthat I've seen... I suspect it might be used in bsd. – xenoterracide♦ Oct 26 '10 at 22:24