Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am going to be installing linux to a USB flash drive (an actual install, not a "live usb"). I need it to be completely portable, so I can't realistically have the high-access partitions (swap, var, etc.) located on a HDD instead. I've read a lot about the limited life of flash memory, as well as the advantages + disadvantages of LVM, but have not found any information that addresses my question. Assuming a reasonable amount of RAM (to minimize swappiness), can using or not using an LVM affect the number of reads/writes done and therefore prolong or shorten the drive's lifespan?

share|improve this question

LVM does not substantially change the number of reads or writes. (Total change is zero in most cases, since all it does is translate some numbers in the write command and pass them down.)

share|improve this answer
Correct, unless youre using snapshots (which implement copy-on-write). The writes are going to happen anyway, LVM just changes where. – Patrick Feb 5 '12 at 5:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.