Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know this is not the best question, I'm just trying to understand what needs improvement.

I just read a Phoronix article, which compared the FOSS radeon drivers a 5 years old FGLRX catalyst. As you would expect FGLRX was multiple times faster, even the feature set was not completely implemented.

The big question, not answered in the article, was why? I noticed FGLRX brings its own libGL, does Nvidia do this also? I know hardware registers are not always completely known, and yadda yadda... I still suspect that mesa is not a strong performer.

What needs to be done to reach remotely close to catalyst speed? What projects need help? Which ones need to be completely ditched?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Well, I do not have inside information about either of the open source or proprietary projects but the answer is pretty simple from my point of view. FOSS video drivers are made by people in their free time on their specific hardware. Many times these programmers does not have the motivation, the hardware resources, the time, the knowledge or professionalism required to write so specific and difficult applications.

I personally admire their effort to make open source video drivers and Nuvou come a long way for NVidia, but regardless of the manufacturer if the development is not directly supported with specifications, knowledge and money by the hardware makers I see no way something open-source can be better than the proprietary driver.

A very positive and good example is Intel which contributes and supports the open-source drivers for their graphics chips, and it does in a way that proprietary drivers are not even made.

share|improve this answer
Do you know if the performance is equal, or very close, to the windows drivers? – TechZilla Feb 4 '12 at 21:31
I can speak only for what I have, an NVidia GeForce FX8600GT. The proprietary NVidia drivers have about the same performance both on Windows XP and Linux (Mandriva and Sabayon). The open-source drivers have huge performance difference, especially in 3D. In 2D I can see no noticeable difference, in 3D it's huge, the open source drivers being about half the speed of the proprietary one. In some cases the difference can be even an order of magnitude. – Patkos Csaba Feb 5 '12 at 11:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.