Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sometimes I need to divide one number by another. It would be great if I could just define a bash function for this. So far, I am forced to use expressions like

echo 'scale=25;65320/670' | bc

but it would be great if I could define a .bashrc function that looked like

divide () {
  bc -d $1 / $2
}
share|improve this question
add comment

7 Answers

up vote 13 down vote accepted

I have a handy bash function called calc:

calc () {
    bc -l <<< "$@"
}

Example usage:

$ calc 65320/670
97.49253731343283582089

$ calc 65320*670
43764400

You can change this to suit yourself. For example:

divide() {
    bc -l <<< "$1/$2"
}

Note: <<< is a here string which is fed into the stdin of bc. You don't need to invoke echo.

share|improve this answer
1  
I agree it's looking better without the additional echo thrown in, but since it's a shell builtin, it comes with little to no additional cost. What keeps me from using '<<<' in shell functions is its limitation to bash, while the additional echo allows using it in the original bourne shell or ksh without changes. –  Tatjana Heuser Jan 31 '12 at 20:49
    
Thanks. I needed a simple calculator like that! –  Joe Feb 4 '12 at 0:45
add comment

Bash can do the math itself to some extent. It's not useful for accuracy, though, as it rounds.

[user]$ echo "$(( 10/5 ))"
2

But you're exactly right - a bash function would be a simple shortcut and your example basically works.

divide() {
  echo "scale=25;$1/$2" | bc
}

Throw that in your .bashrc and then you can:

[user]$ divide 10 5
2.0000000000000000000000000
share|improve this answer
    
echo $((10 / 5)) needs no quotation. –  user unknown Jan 31 '12 at 23:15
add comment

Not really an answer to this precise question, but it might be good to know. Use zsh ;-)

% echo $((65320./670))
97.492537313432834
share|improve this answer
add comment

You probably know the bash builtin 'expr' as in

$ expr 60 / 5
12

which is limited to integers and needs the spaces between the arguments.

What is keeping you from defining a function along the lines of the echo expression you're already using? I.e.

 divide () {
   echo $1/$2 | bc
 }
share|improve this answer
1  
just ignorance. i didn't realize i could make it work that way... –  ixtmixilix Feb 1 '12 at 20:46
add comment

If you have calc installed on your system and you don't like rounding, you can:

div() { calc "$1 / $2"; }
share|improve this answer
    
hmm... couldn't find any debian package for 'calc' –  ixtmixilix Jan 31 '12 at 17:12
    
The package is called apcalc (Arbitary Precision)... The binary is called calc –  Peter.O Jan 31 '12 at 17:37
    
@Peter.O Ok, in the Arch Linux repos it's called calc. –  Herman Torjussen Jan 31 '12 at 18:06
add comment

A dirty hack for small values and a limited precision without using bc would be, to multiply the nominator before division, to get an accurate result.

Example without precision:

echo $((13/7)) 
1

and with 2 digits precision: multiply by 100 and move the decimal point 2 steps to the left:

echo $((100*13/7)) | sed 's/..$/.&/'
1.85
echo $((100*13/7))%
185%

This is only useful if the range of numbers is known before, and the precision is always the same. Avoiding to call bc, and calling sed seems not very reasonable.

Note, that multiplying the values might lead to overflow errors, but not very early:

echo $((1000000000*12345678901))
-6101065172709551616
share|improve this answer
    
Using double parentheses to evaluate math expressions is deprecated. Use: $[expression] instead –  laebshade Feb 6 '12 at 23:06
    
@laebshade: I can prove you wrong, the opposite is true. Here is a citation of the bash manual: The old format $[expression] is deprecated and will be removed in upcoming versions of bash. –  user unknown Feb 7 '12 at 21:29
add comment

Instead of using bc, you could use awk:

div() { awk -v p=$1 -v q=$2 'BEGIN{print p/q}'; }
share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.