Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am doing this just for fun, I have several more powerful machines at hand but thought it would be cool to resurrect an approximately 14 year old machine with a Pentium II processor. I will have to reinstall the RAM so I am not sure how much I will manage to put in there.

So should I use FreeBSD or Damn Small Linux as the distro for this project? I anticipate that I will use it mainly from the command line, though a very basic X-Windows manager would also be welcome.

I am actually leaning towards FreeBSD, since all my prior experience has been with Linux (Ubuntu and Fedora mainly) and this would be an opportunity to explore FreeBSD.

Any suggestions as to distribution, advice or suggestions?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Since you're doing this just for fun and would like to have an opportunity to toy around with a different OS, you might as well try out OpenBSD.

From my experience, I had no problems installing and running a fairly recent OpenBSD version on a system with Pentium I CPU at 166MHz and 24 Megabytes of RAM.

Usually resurrecting and toying around with old boxes is fun, but you're probably won't use them for long -they're noisy, take up space and the energy they consume is not worth it.

share|improve this answer
I second this... though you didn't specify OpenBSD, it works very well on older hardware and uses very few resources in its default configuration. – gabe. Dec 5 '11 at 22:02

It depends on whether you want to use that machine or just learn something new.

If you are not familiar with FreeBSD it can be your place for experiments with that OS (of course it doesn't prevent you to make something useful with this computer).

If you have clear objective and tight schedule I recommend to use OS that you are familiar with - Linux, but not DSL. DSL is pretty old - last release is from 2008. My favorite minidistribution is SliTaz - ISO image is around 30 MB, and there is a lot of packages in repository. There is also some WM in it, but I don't know the details because I'm using base image (8 MB).

On the other hand if the goal is not so unusual (normal desktop/terminal without changes in firewall/kernel and without weird hardware that require additional drivers/kernel modules) there is no difference what you choose - you work with applications not with OS and on FreeBSD and Linux most of application are the same.

share|improve this answer

I think a easier way is use ArchLinux. You can install what you want, a lightweight WM like fluxbox is good enough.

share|improve this answer

FreeBSD 4.11 would fit them best

share|improve this answer

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

You should explain why it would fit best. The asker already knows about FreeBSD, and is (was) looking for advice about how to choose that over other options. – Mat Oct 12 '12 at 6:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.