Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that you can only have 4 primary partitions on a hard drive. But if you're using less than 4, is there a benefit/penalty for using logical partitions?

share|improve this question
The limit of 4 partitions is valid only in MBR partition scheme. There is no such limit with GPT (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table) – mouviciel Sep 30 '10 at 11:05
@mouviciel: Good point – Falmarri Sep 30 '10 at 18:37

Today, it doesn't really matter if you use primary or extended partitions.

There have been times where /boot had to be a primary partition but this isn't true any more. Also earlier incarnations of MS Windows required that you installed Windows to a primary partition.

When I set up a new disk, I make the first partition primary and put /boot there and put the rest as logical partitions into one big extended but this is just a personal preference.

share|improve this answer

I would say that there is indeed some penalty if you use logical instead of primary partitions:

  1. Primary Partitions reside on the first sector - that is a well known place - as opposed to an extended partition.
  2. AFAIK BIOS will still only boot from an active primary partition - so you have the choice to put any bootloader on any of those partitons and make it active.

So if you have up to 3 partitions keep them primary. If you have 4 or more, use the 4th as extended partition and start using logicals.

share|improve this answer
Some badly behaved bioses check that a primary partition is marked active, or they refuse to boot. Otherwise, they just load and execute the boot loader in the MBR, most of which are perfectly capable of booting from a logical partition these days. – psusi Oct 1 '11 at 1:01

Anyway, you're best if you can having as few partitions as possible. Multiple partitions actually slow seek and access times. Many OS's utilize large partitions and its free space for the systems needs.

Reference: http://www.techproceed.com/2014/03/primary-extended-and-logical-partitions.html

share|improve this answer
Where do you get the idea that multiple partitions slow things down? The article you link mentions no such thing. It's also not true. – Patrick May 25 '14 at 7:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.