Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

And vice versa? What about other distributions too?

share|improve this question
rpm :-) Sorry somebody had to say it. – Caleb Jul 30 '11 at 17:38
Enterprise operating systems tend to stay in the 'safe zone' when it comes to libraries, while distros with a predictable and frequent release cycle tend to package the latest stable version. Red Hat will offer the version of the program (and its dependencies) that they support, which is usually quite a bit behind the current version. – Tim Post Jul 30 '11 at 18:20
up vote 6 down vote accepted

For pretty much any software where the source code is available you will almost always be able to get it to work perfectly on any Linux distro (and usually any UNIX-like variant)

However, there are several "commercial" software products that will only work on RedHat. One shameful example is HP OpenView (particularly since Bruce Perens, a former DPL worked for HP for several years and Debian was for a short time HP's recommended distro).

These products often have installation scripts that depend on RedHat specific config files or file locations; or require kernel modules that have been pre-built against RedHat distributed kernels.

Through dedication you might be able to get them to run but it's often a huge pain in the ass. And you'll be running in a totally unsupported configuration as far as the vendor is concerned.

share|improve this answer

I am sure there are a few exception cases, but in general most Linux software is pretty portable across major distros. With Ubuntu and it's cousin Debian being two of the largest distros, it is unlikely that program authors would ignore them. The major exception is that not all versions are packaged for all distros in a prompt fashion. You might run into situations where one distro has a newer version currently in their repositories than another distro.

In general you are more likely to find software packaged for Ubuntu and Not Fedora/RedHat than you are the other way around, but that is a generalization and there is some software found in each that isn't in the others.

share|improve this answer
On the other hand, certain distro-specific helper scripts tend not to exist for other distros -- I suppose in theory you could repackage, say, devscripts or dh-make for Redhat or SuSe, but there would be preciously little point to it as debuild is designed to query a dpkg-style package database to determine dependencies for the binary package it builds out of a source tree... – Shadur Jul 30 '11 at 19:37
@Shadur: I don't think distro-specific programs factor into this question much. Of course emerge isn't available on ArchLinux and poldek isn't on Debian. The myriad of supporting scripts and management tools are what makes a distro a distro. The question here is are their programs besides distro-meta stuff that are or are not available in different places. – Caleb Jul 30 '11 at 20:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.