Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a setup with sftp only users:

Match Group sftponly
    ChrootDirectory %h
    ForceCommand internal-sftp
    AllowTcpForwarding no

I get the following message in my secure.log:

fatal: bad ownership or modes for chroot directory

With the match keyword there comes some security stuff with it... the directories need to be owned by root, and the directories need to be chmod 755 (drwxr-xr-x). So it makes it impossible for a user to have write permissions to the folders, if it is only writable to the user root and set to ben non-writable for groups due to ssh's security.

Someone know about a good work around?

share|improve this question
Do the chrooted users own their ChrootDirectory ? Can they access it ? – John WH Smith Jul 31 '14 at 15:05
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I have same settings on our server. We use same config of SSHD. Users' home directories are owned by root and within them there are folders documents and public_html owned by respective users. Users then login using SFTP and write into those folders (not directly into home). As SSH is not allowed for them, it perfectly works. You can adjust which directories will be created for new users in /etc/skel/ (at least in openSUSE, I'm not so familiar with other distros).

Another possibility would be ACL (openSUSE documentation) - it can add write permission for respective user for his home directory.

share|improve this answer

You need to create a structure inside the user's home directory, like in and out dirs. Those dirs should be owned by the user and there he will be able to put and get files.

share|improve this answer

We've found a workaround recently that goes like this:



Subsystem sftp internal-sftp

Match Group sftponly
    ChrootDirectory /home
    AllowTCPForwarding no
    X11Forwarding no
    ForceCommand internal-sftp

directory permissions:

root@server:~ # chown root:root /home
root@server:~ # chmod 111 /home
root@server:~ # chmod 700 /home/*

Now /home satisfies the requirements for ChrootDirectory and can't be listed by restricted users, but sftponly users will not be able to log in if their home directories are set up as usual (/home/$LOGNAME): under the chrooted environment their home directories aren't inside /home but directly under root (/).

workaround 1

Set restricted users' homes to how they appear under chroot:

root@server:~ # usermod -d /username username

caveate 1

If any of the unrestricted users or some administration script uses bash's tilde expansion like ~username it will expand to /username now, which isn't what is meant.

Also the admin that creates sftponly users has to remember to use non-default home. Solveable with a script. Which the admin has to remember to use.

workaround 2

This is an alternative to the previous one that we ended up using:

root@server:~ # ln -s . /home/home

That is create a symlink inside /home to its own dirname. Now under chroot /home/username points to the same directory as without chroot. For restricted user logged in with sftp it would appear as /username. This directory is writable to its owner (restricted user). Restricted user can't list its parent or home directories of any of the siblings by name.

The only thing special about an sftponly user is its participation in the sftponly group. We found it easier to deal with than the workaround 1.

caveates 2

  1. You can't have user named 'home' with a home directory /home/home
  2. You have to be careful with scripts that traverse /home hierarchy and follow symlinks.
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.