Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Whenever I run file on an ELF binary I get this output:

[jonescb@localhost ~]$ file a.out
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for
GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, 
not stripped

I'm just wondering what changed in Linux 2.6.9 that this binary couldn't run on 2.6.8? Wasn't ELF support added in Linux 2.0? I'm no expert on the history of the kernel though.

share|improve this question
up vote 20 down vote accepted

glibc has a configure option called --enable-kernel that lets you specify the minimum supported kernel version. When object files are linked with that glibc build, the linker adds a SHT_NOTE section to the resulting executable named .note.ABI-tag that includes that minimum kernel version. The exact format is defined in the LSB, and file knows to look for that section and how to interpret it.

The reason your particular glibc was built to require 2.6.9 depends on who built it. It's the same on my system (Gentoo); a comment in the glibc ebuild says that it specifies 2.6.9 because it's the minimum required for the NPTL, so that's likely a common choice. Another one that seems to come up is 2.4.1, because it was the minimum required for LinuxThreads, the package used before NPTL

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.