Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I could not seem to find the question here but I was wondering what experience if any users have had with USB 3.0?

My asus p5x58d has usb 3 on it but I have yet to try it out and also do not know much in terms of support.

I feel this is best as a community wiki where we can share experience on USB 3.0.

This article discussed briefly linux and usb 3.

Let the comments flow...

share|improve this question
Why a -1 with no comment? Is there something wrong about this post? – Chris Sep 7 '10 at 12:49
I am guessing it's because it's subjective? I'm not sure, I wasn't the downvoter. – Josh Sep 26 '10 at 17:42
I suppose, not quite sure how usb 3.0 support is a subjective subject. – Chris Sep 27 '10 at 15:41
It is likely because this is a site fore specific questions and answers. This item would be better as a forum topic somewhere. – Shawn J. Goff Mar 6 '11 at 12:30
@Shawn J. Goff.: Suggestion on where? Did you mean another SE or something like a Linux forum? – Chris May 2 '11 at 17:32

Do an lspci from a root prompt. Do you see anything about "USB 3.0" host adapter in that list? If so, you should enjoy the same support from USB 3.0 devices that Linux provides for USB 2.0 and USB 1.1, which ranges from "Works great!" to "I had to do a bunch of crazy stuff in udev to get this to do what I want" to "There's only Windows drivers for this!".

share|improve this answer
Its not about "explicit" support but more of is it worth for example paying for a usb 3.0 enclosure for external hard drive. I am asking more "do the costs outweigh the benefits" for moving to USB 3.0 now or is it too soon. Appreciate the insight though! – Chris May 2 '11 at 17:31
I would imagine Linux USB mass storage support would not be problematic with USB 3.0, as long as the controller shows up in lspci. I'd say if you need the speedy access to your hard drive through USB then do it. – LawrenceC Jul 5 '11 at 18:56

You may consider esata or sas technologies which may be better than the USB3 and usb c formats for large file transfers.

share|improve this answer
I'm not sure how this answers the question, which appears to be very specifically about USB 3 and says nothing about file transfers. – dhag Nov 3 '15 at 20:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.