Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm evaluating tools for measuring network activity and although mrtg seems to be the most highly regarded, I'm really impressed by ntop. Are there any reasons that mrtg is preferred to ntop?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

They're very different beasts.

Ntop is designed to watch network traffic at the packet level on interfaces. It can only collect information from hosts that have the ability to run ntop and process the packets.

MRTG, on the other-hand, collects information from a much larger variety of sources, typically over SNMP, and from a larger number of devices (because almost everything supports SNMP). But, the type of information available is less exacting as detailed packet-parsing.

So... You really need to try both and decide which one gives you the information you're looking for. And if you like both, then use both!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.