Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can we use bash's conditional operator with assignment operators after colon?

Bash reference manual explains the arithmetic operators as follows.

  • conditional operator expr ? expr : expr
  • assignment = *= /= %= += -= <<= >>= &= ^= |=

First, this code seems to work well:

a=1; ((a? b=1 : 2 )) #seems to work

But when I use assignment operators after :, I got 'attempted assignment to non-variable' error:

a=1; ((a? b=1 : c=1)) #attempted assignment to non-variable error

Why can we use only assignment operators before colon?

share|improve this question
    
It may be fun to perform variable assignments using the conditional operator but it'd make your code highly unreadable. I'd prefer ((a)) && b=1 || c=1 –  devnull Apr 27 at 8:34
    
@devnull I think the code's readability depends most upon who reads it. Still, it may be true what you say, but I've tested ternary operators in dash, zsh, sh, and bash and they all behave the same, despite their not being specified by POSIX. Your example only works in bash and zsh as far as I know. However, this is POSIX friendly: ( : ${a?} ) && b=1 || c=1. I also find it far easier to read than either ternary or your own example. –  mikeserv Apr 27 at 13:05

2 Answers 2

Bash parses your last command as

a=1; (( (a? b=1 : c)=1 ))

which should make clear why it does not work. Instead you have to use

a=1; (( a? b=1 : (c=1) ))
share|improve this answer

This is called a ternary assignment expression. Here's a bit from another answer of mine:

% a=abc
% b=abcd
% t=10 ; f=5
% echo $((r=${#a}>${#b}?t:f)) ; echo $r
> 5 
> 5
% echo $((r=${#a}<${#b}?t:f)) ; echo $r
> 10
> 10

You see, as you say, this is a conditional assignment operation. It depends upon conditions. The syntax works like this:

$((var = $condition <compare_operator> $condition \
    ?if $true_assign :or $false_assign ))

I don't believe you are using this correctly.

From wikipedia:

?: is used as follows:

condition ? value_if_true : value_if_false

The condition is evaluated true or false as a Boolean expression. On the basis of the evaluation of the Boolean condition, the entire expression returns value_if_true if condition is true, but value_if_false otherwise. Usually the two sub-expressions value_if_true and value_if_false must have the same type, which determines the type of the whole expression. The importance of this type-checking lies in the operator's most common use—in conditional assignment statements. In this usage it appears as an expression on the right side of an assignment statement, as follows:

variable = condition ? value_if_true : value_if_false

The ?: operator is similar to the way conditional expressions (if-then-else constructs) work in functional programming languages, like Scheme, ML, and Haskell, since if-then-else forms an expression instead of a statement in those languages.

I think your specific problem is related to this:

As in the if-else construct only one of the expressions 'x' and 'y' are evaluated.

If you read through the above link on ternary expressions you'll see that evaluation is short-circuited so your assignment on the false side errors because 1 = true.

In any case, it doesn't matter too much because I don't think this does what you think it does.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.