Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any way in unix to find out who accessed certain file in last 1 week? It may be user or some script ftp it to some other place. Can I get a list of user name who accessed certain file? How can I find out who is accessing particular file??

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers 4

Unless you have extremely unusual logging policies in place, who accessed what file is not logged (that would be a huge amount of information). You can find out who was logged in at what time in the system logs; the last command gives you login history, and other logs such as /var/log/auth.log will tell you how users authenticated and from where they logged in (which terminal, or which host if remotely).

The date at which a file was last read is called its access time, or atime for short. All unix filesystems can store it, but many systems don't record it, because it has a (usually small) performance penalty. ls -ltu /path/to/file or stat /path/to/file shows the file's access time.

If a user accessed the file and wasn't trying to hide his tracks, his shell history (e.g. ~/.bash_history) may have clues.

To find out what or who has a file open now, use lsof /path/to/file.

To log what happens to a file in the future, use inotifywait. inotifywait -e /path/to will print a line /path/to/ ACCESS file when someone reads file. This interface won't tell you who accessed the file; you can call lsof /path/to/file as soon as this line appears, but there's a race condition (the access may be over by the time lsof gets going).

If you really need to know who reads a file, put it on a loggedfs filesystem.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you Gilles.. I have this dat file created by the script. I just want to know what happens to that file after it is being created.. non of the other scripts are picking it for further process so I want to see if someone is manually accessing that dat file –  Jack Apr 28 '11 at 21:13
    
@Jack: It's hard to say without knowing a lot more about your setup, but as long as nothing removes or renames the file, it'll be there for the other scripts to pick it up, whether or not someone else is accessing it. From your comment, I think you should be looking at what happens when you run your scripts. –  Gilles Apr 28 '11 at 21:17
    
Hey, you could create a nice circular loop with this: syslogd access log file /var/log/audit.log at 10:01\nsyslogd access log file /var/log/audit.log at 10:02\n... –  penguin359 Apr 28 '11 at 21:24
add comment

The previous answer is not the best practice for doing what you ask. Linux has an API for this. The inotify API http://linux.die.net/man/7/inotify

  1. You can write a C program to do what you want just calling the inotify API directly
  2. You can use kfsmd, http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/124903 a daemon that uses inotify
  3. If you want something that works across platforms (inotify is Linux specific) and you are using Java, JNotify works across platforms(Linux, Mac, Windows), abstracting the native OS' underlying API.
share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to Stack Exchange. Answers are not presented in chronological order, so “previous answer” doesn't convey which answer you mean. I wonder which of the other two you're referring to anyway: one doesn't have anything that looks like good or bad practice, and the other one does mention the inotify API. –  Gilles Apr 29 '11 at 10:14
add comment

This is not, in general, feasible. I have seen file systems with enough auditing to make it possible one way or the other, but it is not a general Unix thing, no.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Let me google that for you... Yes you can! This article shows how to use auditctl, ausearch, & aureport on linux kernels 2.6 and above. This one presents a fairly comprehensive guide.

I'm sure there are performance and space overhead to consider, but for anything that requires regulatory compliance or high security, it's just the cost of doing business.

share|improve this answer
2  
It is generally preferred to have an answer here that is self contained, possible with links (which can get outdated) for additional information. –  Anthon May 15 '13 at 17:36
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.