Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Below is my shell script which simply execute a url like this http://example.com:8080/beat and parse the response and verify certain conditions on it. If that condition is met, then exit successfully out of the shell script using exit 0.

set -e



while [[ $COUNT -ge "0" ]]; do

#send the request, put response in variable
DATA=$(wget -O - -q -t 1 http://$HOSTNAME:8080/beat)

#grep $DATA for syncs and syncs_behind
SYNCS=$(echo $DATA | grep -oE 'num_syncs: [0-9]+' | awk '{print $2}')
SYNCS_BEHIND=$(echo $DATA | grep -oE 'num_syncs_behind: [0-9]+' | awk '{print $2}')

echo $SYNCS

#verify conditionals
if [[ $SYNCS -gt "8" && $SYNCS_BEHIND -eq "0" ]]; then exit 0; fi

#decrement the counter
let COUNT-=1

#wait another 10 seconds
sleep 10


I am able to execute the above shell script from Python subprocess module successfully as shown below -

proc = subprocess.Popen(shell_script, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, executable='/bin/bash') 
(stdout, stderr) = proc.communicate()
if proc.returncode != 0:
    # log an error here
    # success log here

But what is happening here is - If you see my shell script I am exiting out of the shell script using exit 0 which is a successful exit I guess and somehow in my Python code, it is logging an error after executing that shell script? Meaning it is going inside if statement somehow.

So is there any way, I can replace exit 0 with some other successful exit call in shell script so that Python script can identify that, it's a successfull exit?

I don't want to modify Python script code..

share|improve this question

closed as unclear what you're asking by Gilles, Anthon, slm, jasonwryan, vonbrand Mar 14 at 10:17

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

exit 0 is a successful exit. If the Python code says otherwise then either your script isn't returning with exit 0 after all, or there's a bug in a part of the Python script you didn't show. Add set -x to your script to make it log what it's doing, maybe some command is failing before exit 0 is hit. If you want further help, post complete code that we can run on our machine. –  Gilles Mar 14 at 2:23
let me try adding set -x in my shell script and then run it again. I have provided the full shell script code and python code which I provided is the only code which is making a call to shell script.. Only the url I haven't provided full and it will not work outside my company firewall so that is the reason I didn't provided. –  Webby Mar 14 at 2:31
Can you show what is the value of proc.returncode. It is possible for instance that the return code is 127 if the python code can't find location of your shell script. –  Ketan Mar 14 at 2:33
@Ketan: That's a good point.. Let me find out that as well. –  Webby Mar 14 at 2:34
It's part of your job when writing the question to provide runnable code if you want debugging help… For example, including the import directives in the Python fragment. –  Gilles Mar 14 at 2:39

1 Answer 1

The problem is probably the set -e:

Exit immediately if a pipeline (which may consist of a single simple command), a subshell command enclosed in parentheses, or one of the commands executed as part of a command list enclosed by braces (see SHELL GRAMMAR above) exits with a non-zero status. The shell does not exit if the command that fails is part of the command list immediately following a while or until keyword, part of the test following the if or elif reserved words, part of any command executed in a && or || list except the command following the final && or ||, any command in a pipeline but the last, or if the command's return value is being inverted with !.

Thus almost every command can make the script exit with a non-zero exit code.

A special problem you are maybe not aware of: The let COUNT-=1 has exit code 1 if the result is 0. I.e. if the script has not executed exit 0 before then it must fail.

You can solve this problem e.g. with:

let COUNT-=1 || true

But the main question is, of course: What is the set -e doing there? And who uses that without understanding the consequences...

share|improve this answer
I think OP edited the question and added set -e. It wasn't in the original script OP posted IIRC. –  Ketan Mar 14 at 3:05
@Ketan That would be really evil. But I don't see the hint (and link to the revision list) when it has been edited. AFAIK this happens only if you edit a few seconds / (very few) minutes after posting. –  Hauke Laging Mar 14 at 3:16
my bad, I had it scrolled down and did not see/paste the top two lines while trying to reproduce. –  Ketan Mar 14 at 3:17
@Ketan No problem, I accept your upvote... –  Hauke Laging Mar 14 at 3:19

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.